Explore / Public profile

Paul Krugman

blog/feed: paulkrugman.substack.com

No conduct flags in posts No reported consequences
Sentiment of their posts (what the content was like, not a character score)
Leans negative-0.30 avg · 5 posts
negativeneutralpositive
3 mixed  2 negative  
This profile is an AI reading of communication style and demonstrated behaviour in this person's own public posts (prompt v4, rolled 2026-09-22 00:17:54). It is opinion about public content, not fact about the person, and it never infers protected characteristics. Every score below links to the posts that produced it.
Style & behaviour attributes
Consistency — claims and stance within the post are coherent 89 · n=4
Professionalism — register appropriate to a public/professional setting 84 · n=5
Reliability signals — concrete commitments, follow-through, specificity over vagueness 83 · n=4
Directness — says things plainly vs hedges or hides the point 82 · n=5
Emotional regulation — measured and proportionate vs volatile or inflammatory 80 · n=4
Respectfulness — how others, critics and opposing views are treated 65 · n=4
Humour — uses humour; note whether it is at others' expense 60 · n=4
Constructiveness — offers solutions, next steps or nuance vs only complaint 55 · n=4
Warmth — friendliness and care toward the audience or people discussed 50 · n=2
Accountability — owns mistakes, gives credit, avoids blame-shifting 50 · n=1
Political stances 3 of 5 posts take one
center-left

Mostly center-left when a stance is taken; stances carry 40% of this person's weighted content. Explicit stances only — never inferred from topic, identity, or association.

Tone
analyticalprofessorialcriticalmeasuredwryacademicself-deprecatingengagingexploratoryerudite
Topics
trade policytrumpinternational relationsus declinepoliticsinternational economicsgeoeconomicseconomic powereconomic theorytariffs
Sources followed
Analyzed posts (5)
PublishedPostSentimentConf.Own voiceLeanFlagsToneStrongest attributes
Sep 21, 2026 Of Donald and Diesel feed
Article text appears incomplete at end but sufficient to assess demonstrated communication style. All criticism is framed within political commentary and economic analysis.
negative -0.75 0.80 0.95 — center-left sardonic, analytical, direct consistency 95 · directness 90 · reliability signals 85
Sep 20, 2026 Why Does Everyone Hate Trump’s Tariffs? feed mixed -0.35 0.85 0.90 — center-left analytical, sarcastic, reasoned professionalism 90 · reliability signals 85 · consistency 85
Sep 19, 2026 Economic Size and Economic Power feed
Transcript cuts off mid-sentence at end; analysis covers complete section available. Academic conference speech setting.
mixed +0.35 0.85 0.92 — — academic, self-deprecating, engaging professionalism 90 · respectfulness 85 · consistency 85
Sep 18, 2026 Fear Strikes Out feed negative -0.75 0.90 0.95 — center-left analytical, critical, measured consistency 90 · professionalism 90 · directness 85
Sep 17, 2026 Fuels and our Money feed
Post is brief and conversational; limited demonstration of most attributes. Appears to be a quick observation with a personal aside rather than substantive economic analysis.
mixed +0.10 0.62 0.98 — — conversational, skeptical, dismissive directness 75 · professionalism 65 · constructiveness 35