No conduct flags in posts No reported consequences
Sentiment of their posts (what the content was like, not a character score)
Mostly positive+0.54 avg · 5 posts
negativeneutralpositive
4 positive 1 neutral
This profile is an AI reading of communication style and demonstrated behaviour in this person's own public posts
(prompt v4, rolled 2026-09-22 00:17:54). It is opinion about public content, not fact about the person,
and it never infers protected characteristics. Every score below links to the posts that produced it.
Style & behaviour attributes
Consistency — claims and stance within the post are coherent
90 · n=1
- “At Airbus' campus, I met Mars rovers, took a test drive” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
Respectfulness — how others, critics and opposing views are treated
90 · n=2
- “With thanks to the Historic County Borders Project” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
- “With thanks to the Historic County Borders Project” — Thomas, a tank engine, is not Thomas the Tank Engine.
Professionalism — register appropriate to a public/professional setting
86 · n=4
- “Producers for Penny4” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
- “use my code TOMSCOTT to get 25% off your first payment” — Thomas, a tank engine, is not Thomas the Tank Engine.
Accountability — owns mistakes, gives credit, avoids blame-shifting
85 · n=1
- “With thanks to the Historic County Borders Project” — Thomas, a tank engine, is not Thomas the Tank Engine.
Directness — says things plainly vs hedges or hides the point
84 · n=5
- “I met Mars rovers, took a test drive” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
- “I find out why Victorians might have found trains terrifying” — Thomas, a tank engine, is not Thomas the Tank Engine.
Reliability signals — concrete commitments, follow-through, specificity over vagueness
84 · n=2
- “Written and presented by Tom Scott” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
- “8,995 codebreakers” — How do you keep 8,995 codebreakers secret?
Constructiveness — offers solutions, next steps or nuance vs only complaint
75 · n=1
- “Next episode right now on Nebula!” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
Warmth — friendliness and care toward the audience or people discussed
64 · n=4
- “Have you seen its wheels?” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
- “fulfilling career that also helps the world” — How do you keep 8,995 codebreakers secret?
Humour — uses humour; note whether it is at others' expense
62 · n=4
- “This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?” — This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
- “Thomas, a tank engine, is not Thomas the Tank Engine” — Thomas, a tank engine, is not Thomas the Tank Engine.
Political stances 0 of 5 posts take one
No explicit political stance in the analyzed posts.
Tone
informativeconversationalengagingenthusiasticplayfulprofessionalstraightforwardcasualself-deprecatingdirectTopics
engineeringmars roverswheelsspace explorationairbushistoryrailwaysvictorian erachallengecodebreakingSources followed
- youtube @TomScottGo
Analyzed posts (5)
| Published | Post | Sentiment | Conf. | Own voice | Lean | Flags | Tone | Strongest attributes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2026 | Can I get into the Top 100 of tiddlywinks in one day?
youtube
Analysis limited to publicly shown metadata; video content not reviewed. |
positive +0.60 | 0.70 | 0.25 quoted | — | — | playful, curious, casual | professionalism 85 · directness 80 · humour 70 |
| Sep 14, 2026 | Thomas, a tank engine, is not Thomas the Tank Engine.
youtube
Analysis limited to video title and description metadata. The poster's full communication style and demonstrated behavior would be better assessed from the actual video content. |
positive +0.35 | 0.65 | 0.60 | — | — | informative, playful, professional | respectfulness 90 · professionalism 90 · directness 85 |
| Sep 7, 2026 | Flying a plane badly, on purpose.
youtube
Analysis limited to title and description metadata; only one sentence of original voice available for assessment. |
positive +0.70 | 0.37 | 0.18 quoted | — | — | humorous, casual, adventurous | humour 80 · directness 80 · warmth 65 |
| Aug 31, 2026 | This Mars rover's cool. But have you seen its wheels?
youtube
Analysis based on video metadata and description only, not actual video content. |
positive +0.75 | 0.85 | 0.80 | — | — | conversational, engaging, informative | respectfulness 90 · consistency 90 · directness 85 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | How do you keep 8,995 codebreakers secret?
youtube
Limited to video description metadata; full video content not provided. Production credits constitute ~70% of text, constraining stylistic assessment. |
neutral +0.05 | 0.65 | 0.30 quoted | — | — | informative, direct, formal | directness 85 · reliability signals 80 · professionalism 80 |