No conduct flags in posts No reported consequences
Sentiment of their posts (what the content was like, not a character score)
Mostly negative-0.42 avg · 5 posts
negativeneutralpositive
1 positive 1 mixed 3 negative
This profile is an AI reading of communication style and demonstrated behaviour in this person's own public posts
(prompt v4, rolled 2026-09-22 00:17:54). It is opinion about public content, not fact about the person,
and it never infers protected characteristics. Every score below links to the posts that produced it.
Style & behaviour attributes
Directness — says things plainly vs hedges or hides the point
87 · n=5
- “That is fucking insane.” — Unionize AI
- “Bigots are everywhere in America, sure” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Consistency — claims and stance within the post are coherent
84 · n=5
- “We all agree this product may cause existential risk” — Unionize AI
- “not a question that allows multiple legitimate answers” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Professionalism — register appropriate to a public/professional setting
71 · n=3
- “Everyone in the world has the right to be themselves” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
- “The dictionary definition is 'any of various egalitarian economic theories'” — I Want You To Tell Me What “Socialism” Means
Emotional regulation — measured and proportionate vs volatile or inflammatory
67 · n=5
- “That is lunacy.” — Unionize AI
- “tell you to fuck off, which would have been proper” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Constructiveness — offers solutions, next steps or nuance vs only complaint
65 · n=5
- “They can organize and they can make demands” — Unionize AI
- “they have stumbled, they have tried to make a workshopped joke” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Reliability signals — concrete commitments, follow-through, specificity over vagueness
61 · n=4
- “Something like one percent of Americans identify as trans” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
- “Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this week” — Capital Is Organizing the World to Its Advantage and Everyth
Humour — uses humour; note whether it is at others' expense
60 · n=5
- “We had equity.” — Unionize AI
- “My pronouns are mom, Texan, and soon to be: governor!” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Warmth — friendliness and care toward the audience or people discussed
51 · n=3
- “signing open letters calling for AI safety” — Unionize AI
- “extend to trans people the same human rights and dignity” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Accountability — owns mistakes, gives credit, avoids blame-shifting
50 · n=2
- “I am not an AI expert.” — Unionize AI
- “I am certainly not an authority on being trans” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Respectfulness — how others, critics and opposing views are treated
45 · n=5
- “I am not an AI expert.” — Unionize AI
- “you do not have any right to call into question” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
Political stances 5 of 5 posts take one
Mostly left when a stance is taken; stances carry 68% of this person's weighted content. Explicit stances only — never inferred from topic, identity, or association.
- center-left “the party that I do plan to vote for” — You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
- left “understand politics as a battleground between capital and labor” — Capital Is Organizing the World to Its Advantage a
- left “one of the most irresponsible presidential administrations in history” — Unionize AI
Tone
directsarcasticinstructivefrustratedcriticalanalyticalurgentindignantwryconversationalTopics
labor organizingai safetyexistential riskcorporate accountabilitytrans-rightsbigotrypolitical-campaignsrepublican-strategypartisan-politicseconomic inequalitySources followed
Analyzed posts (5)
| Published | Post | Sentiment | Conf. | Own voice | Lean | Flags | Tone | Strongest attributes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | I Want You To Tell Me What “Socialism” Means
feed
Text deliberately repetitive to demonstrate definitional confusion; author explicitly avoids prescribing correct definition. |
mixed -0.30 | 0.75 | 0.90 | — | center-left | analytical, critical, sarcastic | directness 85 · consistency 80 · emotional regulation 70 |
| Sep 14, 2026 | Unionize AI
feed
Text appears cut off at final sentence, but core argument is complete. |
negative -0.60 | 0.85 | 0.95 | — | left | critical, sarcastic, urgent | directness 85 · consistency 85 · constructiveness 75 |
| Sep 10, 2026 | You Have to Call Bigots What They Are
feed
Article appears to end mid-sentence; sufficient text for analysis. |
negative -0.65 | 0.85 | 0.95 | — | center-left | indignant, direct, sarcastic | directness 90 · consistency 85 · professionalism 75 |
| Sep 7, 2026 | Capital Is Organizing the World to Its Advantage and Everything Else I
feed
Article text appears truncated but contains substantial material. Author's own voice throughout with extensive data references. |
negative -0.60 | 0.85 | 0.95 | — | left | instructive, analytical, direct | directness 90 · consistency 85 · emotional regulation 70 |
| Sep 2, 2026 | Angie Nixon Wants to Expand the Court, End the Filibuster, and Put ICE
feed
Post includes substantial Nixon quotes (40%+ of text), limiting visibility of Nolan's own voice. Bezos 'trial' reference is satirical about public mock-trial event, not incitement. |
positive +0.70 | 0.78 | 0.48 quoted | — | left | conversational, humorous, direct | directness 80 · consistency 80 · warmth 75 |